Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca
Date: 01:21:12 05/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2001 at 02:37:03, Jouni Uski wrote: >... because Deep Shredder is 1) faster even with single CPU as 99,99% of PC >are and will be(!) 2) better in all test suites and 3) plays better than S5 >e.g. in my own test Deep Shredder - Shredder 5 21,5-18,5. > >Jouni What the programmer says about the Deep Shredder?, but generally the latest is the better one. With not much time to evaluate moves in a game and just relying on the end results then try a fixed opening (Nunn opening positions) 4 games per position 2 might be enough. Better still against other opponents. BTW your result is liked from a Nunn2 opening positions?! it's very close because both engines probably have many similarities. Yes it doesn't make sense. //Dinan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.