Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 08:34:51 05/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2001 at 10:18:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 30, 2001 at 08:23:38, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On May 30, 2001 at 08:07:19, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 30, 2001 at 07:05:02, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>He's a monster! Look what he did to scrappy (crafty) in an 11 game session on >>>>ICC: >>>> >>>>82: + 3382 W 3365 scrappy [ br 5 7] A44 Res May 30 01 05:15 >>>>81: = 3365 B 3382 scrappy [ br 5 7] A03 Agr May 30 01 04:57 >>>>80: = 3364 W 3383 scrappy [ br 5 7] A43 Agr May 30 01 04:35 >>>>79: = 3363 B 3384 scrappy [ br 5 7] B07 Agr May 30 01 04:10 >>>>78: = 3362 W 3385 scrappy [ br 5 7] A40 Agr May 30 01 02:25 >>>>77: = 3361 B 3386 scrappy [ br 5 7] A46 50 May 30 01 01:54 >>>>76: = 3360 W 3387 scrappy [ br 5 7] D02 Rep May 30 01 01:39 >>>>75: = 3359 W 3384 scrappy [ br 5 7] A40 Agr May 29 01 20:26 >>>>74: + 3358 B 3385 scrappy [ br 5 7] B07 Res May 29 01 19:57 >>>>73: = 3339 B 3414 scrappy [ br 5 7] B07 Agr May 29 01 18:11 >>>>72: = 3335 W 3418 scrappy [ br 5 7] A40 Agr May 29 01 17:55 >>>> >>>>If he can do this at blitz, what chance would computer chess programs have >>>>against him at slow chess? I think it is possible that Roman is the strongest >>>>player in the world against computers. What does everybody else think about >>>>that? >>> >>>I think that Crafty has the disadvantage that it is a free program. >>> >>>I guess that a lot of GM can beat Crafty at 5 7 time control in 11 games match >>>if they train enough against it at home but other simply do not try it because >>>they cannot earn much from it. >>> >>>I am more interested to know if JRLOK can do it against Ferret(In this case he >>>has the problem that he cannot play against Ferret hundreds of games when Ferret >>>and Bruce have no idea about the games). >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>But it seems that Crafty has more "anti-anti-computer" code in it than other >>programs, which are tuned to play other comps rather than humans. For example, a >>lot of other programs succumb more easily to humans with simply a stonewall >>attack, which does not work so well against crafty. > > >This guy _is_ incredibly strong. But there are other things that are important >here. IE he often wants to play vs a specific opening, which I always allow if >asked. Several draws and a couple of wins is very unusual, but it can happen. >By the same token I have seen him lose 20 straight too, of course... I have a feeling that his bad streaks are due to his being tired. I know from my experience that my playing strength can vary in a 400 point range. Sometimes my bad days are totally unexpected. Recently, I watched my bullet rating plummet to below 1800. I had what I thought was a good nights sleep. I felt fine, but then I could only manage to win 1 out of 18 games! I figure that when Roman is in good playing form, he can hold his own against comps easy. > >People are worried about Kramnik losing to deep fritz. This GM on ICC can >find any small weakness in a program and drive a truck through it. And he will >tell you what he found. And then it becomes amazing to see how once he finds >such a weakness, he can then create the positions where that weakness suddenly >becomes important. > >I'll soon hear about what he is doing. It is also remotely possible that this >is one of two former world champions, as well. I'll find out in a week or so.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.