Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Palm Tiger vs Sapphire II [results & PGN]

Author: O. Veli

Date: 12:31:04 05/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 29, 2001 at 19:38:37, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On May 29, 2001 at 14:19:42, Ian Osgood wrote:
>
>>Sapphire II (dedicated 32 MHz H8, 118KB hash, ~4500 nps)
>>Chess Tiger (PalmIIIe overclocked to 28 MHz, 48K hash, MSpeed=300/450/570 nps)
>
>Well that does not look good for Tiger. I guess the H8 is much faster than the
>DragonBall. Looking at the NPS figures, it looks like the Sapphire is 10 times
>faster. I guess its program does less things in each position (less
>evaluation?)...
>
>It is going to take an even more overclocked Palm and longer time controls to
>see Tiger coming back I think.

  What about Star Sapphire? IIRC it will (eventually!!) use DragonBall processor
instead of the H8. It was rumored to be 50 points stronger than Sapphire II.
Tiger is a very strong program that has been ported to DragonBall. W-Chess is
also strong but I do not see how W-chess can improve so much from changing H8 to
Dragonball (and hence lose strength) and then improve so that it is even
stronger than Sapphire II.

  My idea is that either Star Sapphire will be a weaker than Sapphire II or that
Star Sapphire will use the H8 processor. Any ideas?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.