Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 17:52:36 05/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2001 at 18:50:21, K. Burcham wrote: > > >do you ever see the big dogs using 450 mhz in a top tournament. >if they are, they may be a big dog---but they are losing big dogs. > >why is this posted here with such old hardware. > >are the top programs exactly proportional to a mhz increase. >have we proven this with lots of games. > >in other words, is tiger on 1000 mhz twice as strong as tiger on >500 mhz, is tiger on 1500 mhz three times as strong as tiger on 500 mhz. >please dont reply with estimated elo increase for mhz increase---i have read all >of those posts and am aware of the opinions on this. > >i think you understand my point. maybe some programs strength will increase more >with more mhz. for example maybe tiger on 1500 mhz amd will win more games >against a certain program also on 1500 mhz. but if both programs are on 500 mhz, >maybe they draw. > >i know this logic has been discussed here and this is a repeat of posts. >but those antique 450 processors-----oh well > >thanks But I can assure you that the increase in strength will not be more than 80 rating points. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.