Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:56:17 05/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2001 at 20:52:36, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 30, 2001 at 18:50:21, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >> >>do you ever see the big dogs using 450 mhz in a top tournament. >>if they are, they may be a big dog---but they are losing big dogs. >> >>why is this posted here with such old hardware. >> >>are the top programs exactly proportional to a mhz increase. >>have we proven this with lots of games. >> >>in other words, is tiger on 1000 mhz twice as strong as tiger on >>500 mhz, is tiger on 1500 mhz three times as strong as tiger on 500 mhz. >>please dont reply with estimated elo increase for mhz increase---i have read all >>of those posts and am aware of the opinions on this. >> >>i think you understand my point. maybe some programs strength will increase more >>with more mhz. for example maybe tiger on 1500 mhz amd will win more games >>against a certain program also on 1500 mhz. but if both programs are on 500 mhz, >>maybe they draw. >> >>i know this logic has been discussed here and this is a repeat of posts. >>but those antique 450 processors-----oh well >> >>thanks > >But I can assure you that the increase in strength will not be more than 80 >rating points. > >Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.