Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 11:26:54 05/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2001 at 13:32:44, James T. Walker wrote: >Here is a position reached by Deep Shredder at G/60. Deep Shredder had >approximately 15 minutes on the clock when it took only 13 seconds to make the >blunder (Athlon 900 360 M hash tables). >(not sure if diagram will show up----haven't done it in a long time) > >[D]R7/8/3K4/8/7P/5P2/3p4/1k6 w - - > >Here Deep Shredder abandoned the perpetual check and played 75. Ke5 ?? Three >moves later Deep Shredder announced "Mate in 53" on itself. :( Hello James! Here my analysis with Deep Shredder on P600, 128 Mb hash, 5-pieces TBs: 2.00 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (741) 4.2 3.00 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (760) 4.3 4.00 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (1.103) 1.4 5.00 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (1.640) 1.8 6.00 0:01 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (2.193) 1.8 7.01 0:01 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (4.383) 3.6 8.01 0:01 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (8.038) 4.1 9.01 0:02 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (13.150) 4.4 10.01 0:03 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (18.614) 5.6 11.01 0:03 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (20.876) 6.3 12.01 0:03 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (35.182) 10.4 13.01 0:03 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (57.852) 15.2 14.01 0:05 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 (92.984) 16.8 15.01 0:12 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 2.Ta8+ Kb1 3.Tb8+ (287.541) 22.2 16.01 0:15 0.00 1.Tb8+ Ka1 2.Ta8+ Kb1 3.Tb8+ (376.583) 25.0 oh,..... I see now the kN/s going down :-( Now I started my PC (with windows 98SE) new. Analysis Deep Shredder on P600, with 128 Mb hash, without TBs: 4.00 0:00 -1.58 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kd3 3.f4 d1D (3.832) 49.7 5.00 0:00 0.00++ 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (6.467) 71.8 5.00 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (7.766) 77.6 6.00 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (10.736) 96.7 7.01 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (17.324) 119.4 8.01 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (29.362) 143.2 9.01 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (45.566) 162.7 10.01 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (67.970) 178.8 11.01 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (86.879) 188.8 12.01 0:00 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (134.005) 203.0 13.01 0:01 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (260.585) 219.9 14.01 0:01 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (398.825) 231.8 15.01 0:02 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (604.905) 239.0 16.01 0:03 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (913.653) 243.3 17.01 0:05 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (1.325.145) 246.2 18.01 0:08 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (2.168.108) 249.2 19.01 0:17 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (4.245.994) 245.3 20.01 0:25 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (6.384.141) 246.4 21.01 0:38 0.00 1.Tb8+ Kc2 2.Tc8+ Kb3 3.Tb8+ Kc2 4.Tc8+ (9.426.485) 247.4 I don't know where are problem on your PC + DS, sorry. Kind Regards, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.