Author: william penn
Date: 15:20:02 05/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2001 at 17:14:35, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 31, 2001 at 16:35:04, william penn wrote: > >> I Asked Grandmaster Dreev about his game against Deep Shredder on Icc >>yesterday. I asked him point blank, if he believed that deep shredder was >>grandmaster strength. His exact words were "there are GRANDMASTERS and >>grandmasters, definitely it is very strong". I then said that i thought he was >>being kind of vague, since at that moment i did not understand what he was >>saying, so i asked him "well do you think that shredder could maintain a 2500 >>elo? He then said " YES I THINK IT WOULD GET EVEN HIGHER THEN THAT. > >That doesn't exactly prove or demonstrate anything. I imagine that some would >say they're not, while others would go for the compromize and say GM strength at >certain aspects of the game and a patzer when considering another. Furthermore, >it's not uncommon to overestimate the strength of an opponent when you only >managed a draw. > >Mogens. Yeah, just like some international masters and grandmasters have said that deep blue isn't a grandmaster?, one word biased.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.