Author: Slater Wold
Date: 17:08:22 05/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2001 at 13:32:44, James T. Walker wrote: >Here is a position reached by Deep Shredder at G/60. Deep Shredder had >approximately 15 minutes on the clock when it took only 13 seconds to make the >blunder (Athlon 900 360 M hash tables). >(not sure if diagram will show up----haven't done it in a long time) > >[D]R7/8/3K4/8/7P/5P2/3p4/1k6 w - - > >Here Deep Shredder abandoned the perpetual check and played 75. Ke5 ?? Three >moves later Deep Shredder announced "Mate in 53" on itself. :( I have _NO_ idea what you were using, or how your Shredder came to this conclusion. Dual PIII 1000mhz - 128MB HASH - Deep Shredder 5.0 1.00 0:00 -1.08-- 1.Ra2 d1Q+ 2.Rd2 (246) 1.00 0:00 -1.08 1.Ra2 d1Q+ 2.Rd2 (273) 1.00 0:00 -1.07++ 1.f4 d1Q+ 2.Ke6 (288) 1.00 0:00 -0.84 1.f4 d1Q+ 2.Ke6 (306) 1.00 0:00 +13.00++ 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb3 (336) 1.00 0:00 +10.65 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb3 (356) 2.00 0:00 +7.57-- 1.Rb8+ Ka1 2.h5 d1Q+ 3.Ke6 Qxf3 (497) 2.00 0:00 0.00-- 1.Rb8+ Ka1 2.Ra8+ Kb1 3.Rb8+ (762) 2.00 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Ka1 2.Ra8+ Kb1 3.Rb8+ (820) 3.00 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Ka1 2.Ra8+ Kb1 3.Rb8+ (1.049) 4.00 0:00 -0.55-- 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.f4 d1Q+ 3.Ke5 Kd3 (2.898) 4.00 0:00 -1.08-- 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.f4 d1Q+ 3.Ke6 Qc1 (2.972) 4.00 0:00 -1.58 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kd3 3.f4 d1Q (4.250) 5.00 0:00 -1.32++ 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Kc7 d1Q 4.f4 (6.397) 399.8 5.00 0:00 -0.68++ 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc3 4.Rb1 Kc2 5.f4 Kxb1 (6.562) 410.1 5.00 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (8.715) 544.6 6.00 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (11.148) 696.7 7.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (18.648) 582.7 8.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (29.469) 377.8 9.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (42.805) 227.6 10.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (56.134) 276.5 11.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (66.404) 282.5 12.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (103.791) 221.3 13.01 0:00 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (182.364) 194.4 14.01 0:01 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (265.642) 212.5 15.01 0:01 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (380.041) 223.1 16.01 0:03 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (580.637) 178.6 17.01 0:05 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (838.116) 145.7 18.01 0:08 0.00 1.Rb8+ Kc2 2.Rc8+ Kb2 3.Rb8+ Kc2 4.Rc8+ (1.309.064) 149.0 best move: Ra8-b8 time: 0:14.078 min n/s: 130.071 CPU 97.4% nodes: 1.831.141 TB: 71.722 Never even LOOKS at it. And only uses 97.4% of the 2 processors, which tells me that for SURE an AMD 900mhz could get this here. Also using ALL 3/4/5 piece TB's. I don't know if you were or not. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.