Author: pete stein
Date: 22:13:40 06/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2001 at 22:42:17, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 01, 2001 at 21:49:27, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>All the names you mentioned, I already had. >> >>The "brute force openings" are clearly useless. Not only are they _already_ >>100% classified by the current system, but also most of them are boneheaded. >>They don't deserve any sort of separate entries. >> >>There were a few that I was missing. The new file has all the updates. > >I should mention also that there were some errors in it. I just threw those >out. > >Pete's name has been added to the top of the file as one of the contributors. > >It would probably have been better to send me an email instead of posting it >here. They look bone-headed at first sight but some may become useful in a later stage e.g. where an apparent sacrifice can be used to block mobility of an opponent's major piece. So eco.pgn is updated already ? So quick ? If not manually like was suggested later in this thread, with which pgn tool ? Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.