Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:01:41 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 2001 at 10:18:54, stuart taylor wrote: >That will probably let CT down quite a few points. >For CM8000, it sounds much more impressive than some slightly winning results >against some much older program. >S.Taylor Losing 8-4 suggest that chessmaster is 133 points weaker then Tiger14. I do not see it as something impressive. Deep Fritz is 103 points better than Fritz5.32 on 450 mhz based on the ssdf list. Fritz5.32 is 3 elo better than Chessmaster6000 on 200 Mhz. It means that Deep Fritz is probably only 106 elo better than chessmaster6000. Tiger14 does not seem to be clearly better than Deep fritz so 133 elo weaker than Tiger14 is not more impressive than 106 elo weaker than Deep Fritz. I am not going to be impressed if I discover that chessmaster8000 is only 20 elo weaker than chessmaster6000 and not 200 elo weaker than chessmaster6000. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.