Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 03:10:22 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2001 at 06:04:56, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On June 01, 2001 at 17:59:45, John Merlino wrote: > >>On June 01, 2001 at 11:13:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>[Event "It Astana"] >>>[Site "?"] >>>[Date "2001.??.??"] >>>[Round "?"] >>>[White "Kasparov,G"] >>>[Black "Kramnik,V"] >>>[ECO "C67"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>> >>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. d4 Nd6 >>>6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. dxe5 Nf5 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Nc3 h6 10. h3 Bd7 >>>11. b3 Ke8 12. Bb2 Rd8 13. Rad1 Ne7 14. Rfe1 Ng6 15. Ne4 >>>Nf4 16. e6 Nxe6 17. Nd4 c5 18. Nf5 Rh7 19. Bf6 Rc8 20. Bxg7 >>>Bxg7 21. Nxg7+ Rxg7 22. Nf6+ Ke7 23. Nxd7 Rd8 24. Ne5 Rxd1 >>>25. Rxd1 Nf4 26. Kh1 Rg5 27. Ng4 Rd5 28. Re1+ Kf8 29. Nxh6 >>>Rd2 30. Re5 Rxf2 31. Rf5 Kg7 32. Ng4 Rxg2 33. Rxf4 Rxc2 >>>34. Rf2 Rc3 35. Kg2 b5 36. h4 c4 37. h5 cxb3 38. axb3 Rc5 >>>39. h6+ Kf8 40. Nf6 Rg5+ 41. Kh1 1-0 >>> >>>What was the loosing move vor black? >>> >>>I think it was move 27...Rd5? >>> >>>[D]8/ppp1kp2/7p/2p3r1/5nN1/1P5P/P1P2PP1/3R3K b - - >>> >>>What say the best programs ? >>> >>>Eduard >> >>CM8000 agrees with DeepShredder (as mentioned in a different post): >> >>Before 30...Rxf2: >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>0:00 1/4 0.61 2807 4...Rxc2 5. Rf5 Rxf2 6. Rxf7+ Ke8 >>0:00 3/6 0.86 22539 4...Rxc2 5. Rf5 Rxf2 6. Rxf7+ Ke8 >> 7. h4 Rf1+ 8. Kh2 Rf2 >>0:01 4/7 0.90 73421 4...Rxc2 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Rxf4 Kxh6 >> 7. Rxf7 Rxa2 8. Rxc7 Rxf2 9. Rxb7 >>0:03 5/8 0.90 261099 4...Rxc2 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Rxf4 Kxh6 >> 7. Rxf7 Rxa2 8. Rxc7 Rxf2 9. Rxb7 >>0:07 5/8 0.87 567220 4...Ne6 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Rxf7+ Kxh6 >> 7. Rf6+ Kg5 8. Rxe6 Rxc2 9. Kg1 >> Rxa2 10. Re5+ Kg6 11. Rxc5 >>0:09 6/9 0.79 801199 4...Ne6 5. Rf5 Rxc2 6. Rxf7+ Ke8 >> 7. h4 Rxa2 8. g4 Rb2 9. Rf6 Kd7 >>0:27 7/10 0.58 2657640 4...Ne6 5. Rf5 Rxc2 6. Rxf7+ Ke8 >> 7. a4 c4 8. bxc4 Rxc4 9. a5 b5 >> 10. axb6ep axb6 >>1:18 8/11 0.47 7861451 4...Ne6 5. Rf5 Rxc2 6. Rxf7+ Ke8 >> 7. a3 Rb2 8. f4 Rxb3 9. f5 Nd8 >> 10. Rxc7 Rxa3 11. Rxc5 >>3:53 9/12 0.51 24016174 4...Ne6 5. Rf5 Rxc2 6. Rxf7+ Ke8 >> 7. a4 c4 8. bxc4 Rxc4 9. a5 a6 >> 10. g3 Rc5 11. Rf6 Kd7 >> >>After 30...Rxf2: >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>0:00 2/5 1.26 12269 5. Rxc5 Ne6 6. Rf5 Rxc2 7. Rxf7+ >> Ke8 >>0:00 3/6 1.11 25013 5. Rxc5 Rxg2 6. Rxc7 Rg3 7. Rc8+ >> Ke7 8. Nf5+ Kd7 >>0:02 4/7 1.20 87851 5. Rxc5 Kg7 6. Ng4 Ne6 7. Nxf2 >> Nxc5 8. Nd3 >>0:03 5/8 1.20 244530 5. Rxc5 Ne6 6. Rf5 Rxc2 7. Rxf7+ >> Ke8 8. a3 Rc3 9. Rf6 Kd7 >>0:08 6/9 1.11 731426 5. Rxc5 Ne6 6. Ra5 Rxc2 7. Rxa7 >> Kg7 8. Nf5+ Kf6 9. Ra5 Kg6 10. Kh2 >>0:14 6/9 1.38 1259926 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Ng4 Rxg2 7. Rxf4 >> Rxc2 8. Rf2 Rxf2 9. Nxf2 f5 10. >> Kg2 >>0:24 7/10 1.36 2291595 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Ng4 Rxg2 7. Rxf4 >> Rxc2 8. Rf2 Rxf2 9. Nxf2 f5 10. >> Nd3 >>1:02 8/11 1.51 6080183 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Ng4 Rxg2 7. Rxf4 >> Rxc2 8. Rf2 Rxf2 9. Nxf2 f5 10. >> Nd3 b6 11. Kg2 >>2:38 9/12 1.47 16397563 5. Rf5 Kg7 6. Ng4 Rxg2 7. Rxf4 >> Rxc2 8. Rf2 Rxf2 9. Nxf2 f5 10. >> Nd3 b6 11. Kg2 Kf6 >> >>Loss of a full point, basically.... >> >>jm > Thanks John ! We (in german ChessBits) discuss now likewise a new position: [D]8/ppp2pk1/7N/2pr4/5n2/1P5P/P1P2PP1/4R2K w - - 0 1 Kramnik played 29...Rd2. We think now that 29...Kg7 is stronger! Thanks, and best wishes, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.