Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:53:56 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2001 at 03:01:41, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 01, 2001 at 10:18:54, stuart taylor wrote: > >>That will probably let CT down quite a few points. >>For CM8000, it sounds much more impressive than some slightly winning results >>against some much older program. >>S.Taylor > >Losing 8-4 suggest that chessmaster is 133 points weaker then Tiger14. > >I do not see it as something impressive. > >Deep Fritz is 103 points better than Fritz5.32 on 450 mhz >based on the ssdf list. > >Fritz5.32 is 3 elo better than Chessmaster6000 on 200 Mhz. >It means that Deep Fritz is probably >only 106 elo better than chessmaster6000. > >Tiger14 does not seem to be clearly better than Deep fritz >so 133 elo weaker than Tiger14 is not more impressive than >106 elo weaker than Deep Fritz. > >I am not going to be impressed if I discover that chessmaster8000 >is only 20 elo weaker than chessmaster6000 and not >200 elo weaker than chessmaster6000. > >Uri On my own rating list which I'll soon post I have a difference of 112 points between CT 14.0 and Chessmaster 8000. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.