Author: william penn
Date: 11:49:26 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2001 at 10:53:56, Chessfun wrote: >On June 02, 2001 at 03:01:41, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 01, 2001 at 10:18:54, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>That will probably let CT down quite a few points. >>>For CM8000, it sounds much more impressive than some slightly winning results >>>against some much older program. >>>S.Taylor >> >>Losing 8-4 suggest that chessmaster is 133 points weaker then Tiger14. >> >>I do not see it as something impressive. >> >>Deep Fritz is 103 points better than Fritz5.32 on 450 mhz >>based on the ssdf list. >> >>Fritz5.32 is 3 elo better than Chessmaster6000 on 200 Mhz. >>It means that Deep Fritz is probably >>only 106 elo better than chessmaster6000. >> >>Tiger14 does not seem to be clearly better than Deep fritz >>so 133 elo weaker than Tiger14 is not more impressive than >>106 elo weaker than Deep Fritz. >> >>I am not going to be impressed if I discover that chessmaster8000 >>is only 20 elo weaker than chessmaster6000 and not >>200 elo weaker than chessmaster6000. >> >>Uri > >On my own rating list which I'll soon post I have a difference >of 112 points between CT 14.0 and Chessmaster 8000. > >Sarah. which demonstrates how pitifully weak cm8000 is.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.