Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:59:59 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2001 at 14:36:59, Mike S. wrote: >On June 02, 2001 at 09:19:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I have some position with only one queen and also from real games(ICC >>tournaments) >>I used chessmaster6000(ss=10) > >Chess Tiger 14 has also shown some impressively fast mate announcements >recently, so I chose it to compare with your Chessmaster 6000 results, using an >P3/700 with 24 MB Hash. But except in the 2nd position, CM is (much) better >here... (I didn't test the last two very long mates). CM's higher selectivity >setting - 10 isn't the standard IIRC? - seems to work fine for this type of >positions. 10 is not the standard but I know that it is better for test positions. You also cannot know that chessmaster is better based on your results because you gave tiger only 3 minutes and chessmaster needed more than 3 minutes on faster hardware for some of my positions. I posted the exact time for most of them and for the positions that I did not post "a long time" means clearly more than 3 minutes Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.