Author: Graham Banks
Date: 14:51:49 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2001 at 14:49:26, william penn wrote: >On June 02, 2001 at 10:53:56, Chessfun wrote: > >>On June 02, 2001 at 03:01:41, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On June 01, 2001 at 10:18:54, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>That will probably let CT down quite a few points. >>>>For CM8000, it sounds much more impressive than some slightly winning results >>>>against some much older program. >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>Losing 8-4 suggest that chessmaster is 133 points weaker then Tiger14. >>> >>>I do not see it as something impressive. >>> >>>Deep Fritz is 103 points better than Fritz5.32 on 450 mhz >>>based on the ssdf list. >>> >>>Fritz5.32 is 3 elo better than Chessmaster6000 on 200 Mhz. >>>It means that Deep Fritz is probably >>>only 106 elo better than chessmaster6000. >>> >>>Tiger14 does not seem to be clearly better than Deep fritz >>>so 133 elo weaker than Tiger14 is not more impressive than >>>106 elo weaker than Deep Fritz. >>> >>>I am not going to be impressed if I discover that chessmaster8000 >>>is only 20 elo weaker than chessmaster6000 and not >>>200 elo weaker than chessmaster6000. >>> >>>Uri >> >>On my own rating list which I'll soon post I have a difference >>of 112 points between CT 14.0 and Chessmaster 8000. >> >>Sarah. > > which demonstrates how pitifully weak cm8000 is. I doubt whether many would consider a GM who was 112 ELO below Kasparov to be pitifully weak compared to Kasparov! This indicates the exaggeration in your statement. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.