Author: Slater Wold
Date: 15:49:21 06/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
I agree 100%. While C vs C is interesting, I have came to the conclusion that C vs C does NOT calculate ELO. According to SSDF, Deep Fritz is 2600+ and Shredder is technically the "World Champ" and SHOULD have a higher ELO. However Petr said that Shredder performed @ approx. 2100-2200 in our game. And I do NOT disagree. Shredder played like a complete patzer. I have gone over and over the dump file from Shredder 1,000 times. It changed plans every move. It gathered no intiative, and developed nothing. It simple played a very reactive game of chess. Reactive playing is of course NOT the way to win. I played the game, with the SAME time controls with Deep Shredder vs Fritz 6 from the moment I went out of book. (Out of book for good that is.) Is it surprising that Deep Shredder won? Petr and I will be playing again soon. I hope to play EVER GM on ICC at LEAST 1 30/10 game. After the game, I told Petr, "I searched the DB, and I noticed you have NEVER won a game against a (C) here with a standard timer. How did you do so well here." He simply replied, "I test theory with computers. And none of those games were for money." Lesson being: Don't tempt GM's with money. :) Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.