Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 09:40:28 06/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2001 at 12:25:31, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On June 03, 2001 at 12:04:59, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>Since you'd made me curious, Djordje, I have also played a bit (but not a >>statistically relevant set) with the tigers at game in 2 and 3 minutes. >> >>I 've got the impression that it's tiger's time management which could cause a >>problem in these games. I observed that it moves always far faster than the >>opponents. Wereas under longer time controls this seems to work reasonably, this >>could perhaps be a problem when there are only 2 minutes for the whole game >>available. In this case it should really use efficiently the available time. >> >>Just a 1st impression from observing a few games. May of course be completely >>wrong. >> >>Regards, Uli > >Hi! > >I was curious too so I tried game in 2 on 2 computers. >After 4 games Tiger14 leads with 2,5-1,5. Tiger on Amd450 and Phalanx on A1200. > >Both programs use the time as they should. I'd tried a game in 3 min on one PC (KIII/450). In this game Phalanx had got an advantage, and Tiger moved very fast (but not as fast as in Djordje's games). It did seem to me in this game that its time management could cause problems at very fast time controls. You played on 2 PCs, where you have permamnent brain enabled. This means that tiger is using its oppopnent's time too. So, this effect is far less drastic. But it was only one game, which I'd played and Djordje's games seem to be irrelevant for some strange reason ? Perhaps, we should just forget about these peculiarities. Uli > >Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.