Author: John Merlino
Date: 19:21:32 06/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2001 at 17:33:57, Eric Tom wrote: >On June 03, 2001 at 13:36:32, Dana Turnmire wrote: > >>On June 03, 2001 at 03:38:34, william penn wrote: >> >>>On June 03, 2001 at 01:54:50, Dana Turnmire wrote: >>> >>>> Genius 2 is several years old now but notice how it crushed the Q-side castled >>>>position of Chessmaster 8000 (both on default settings). This is typical of how >>>>Genius plays. (30 min/game) >>>> >>>> White "Chessmaster" >>>> Black "Genius 2" >>>> >>>>1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. f4 Bg7 5. Nf3 c5 6. dxc5 Qa5 7. Bd3 Qxc5 8. Qe2 >>>>Nc6 9. Be3 Qa5 10. 0-0-0 0-0 11. Bc4 a6 12. Nd5 Nxd5 13. exd5 b5 14. Bb3 Nb8 15. >>>>Bd4 Re8 16. Bxg7 Kxg7 17. Rhe1 Nd7 18. Kb1 Nc5 19. h3 Qb6 20. Qe3 a5 21. a3 b4 >>>>22. Bc4 Rb8 23. Qd4+ Kg8 24. Re3 bxa3 25. Rxa3 Qc7 26. Re1 Rb4 27. Nd2 Bd7 28. >>>>Rae3 Bb5 29. b3 Bxc4 30. Nxc4 a4 31. Qc3 Rb5 32. Nd2 axb3 33. cxb3 Qb7 34. Qc4 >>>>Rb4 35. Qc2 Rxf4 36. Qc3 Rf2 37. g4 e5 38. dxe6ep fxe6 39. R3e2 Rxe2 40. Rxe2 >>>>Qh1+ 41. Qc1 Qxh3 42. Qc4 d5 43. Qc2 Qg3 44. Nf1 Qxg4 45. Re1 Qb4 46. Nd2 Nxb3 >>>>47. Qxb3 Qxd2 48. Rd1 Qe2 49. Rc1 Qe4+ 50. Kb2 Qe5+ 51. Qc3 Rb8+ 52. Ka1 d4 53. >>>>Qc5 Qe3 54. Qc8+ Rxc8 55. Rxc8+ Kg7 56. Kb2 d3 57. Rc7+ Kh6 58. Rc1 Qd2+ 59. Kb1 >>>>e5 60. Rh1+ Kg7 61. Rc1 Qb4+ 62. Ka2 d2 63. Rh1 e4 64. Rg1 e3 65. Rb1 Qa4+ 66. >>>>Kb2 e2 67. Kc3 d1=Q 68. Rb7+ Kh6 69. Rxh7+ Kxh7 70 Kb2 Qaa1# >>> >>>nice game, but i think castling queens side for cm was the fatal mistake >> >> You may be right because this is the move where CM8000 goes out of book. I >>took Genius out of book and it moves 10. Bd2 so the opening book may the >>albatross around Chessmaster 8000's neck. > > >You hit the jackpot! The opening book is the main problem of CM8000. > >Kind Regards, >Eric In this case, at least, the opening book is not the problem. The move 10.0-0-0 is the first move AFTER leaving Chessmaster's book, and CM gives it a score of 0.30 for White. CM would have switched to 10.Bd2 after 2:32 on my PIII-733, if the time control had allowed (and it didn't). See this post (www.chessusa.com/forums/1/message.shtml?173153) for all of my findings about this game (nothing very interesting, just some notes, really).... jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.