Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: just a few excuses for cm8000

Author: Tina Long

Date: 23:20:47 06/03/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 02, 2001 at 06:43:22, william penn wrote:

>No tina i didn't save the games, but i think it is awfully silly of you to ask
>me to post them, i could easily fabricate a win against cm8000 and post the
>games, and you would not know if i actually played the game or not, or i could
>get my master pals games and say i played them, so i don;'t see what posting
>games would prove? Do you??

Ah, he awakes!

Posting the games might add some insight into where CM8k is weak against Humans,
and comparing the games to CM6555 games might indicate what changes took place
from the last King to this King.  If you are good enough to beat CM8k then your
comments on the relative strengths of CM6555 & CM8k are indeed relevant.

Posting the games might add credence to your claim that you have beaten CM8k
twice & drawn with it once.

Posting the games might initiate an interesting discussion on whether the winner
is really a human, & whether it is really you.

Posting the games might add interest in the arguments about modern PC programs
being of Grandmaster level.

I enjoy seeing any games where a Human has beaten a Machine.  These are far more
interesting than Machine-Machine victories.

Hi guys
Tina Long




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.