Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:32:10 06/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 04, 2001 at 17:47:05, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On June 04, 2001 at 11:10:30, leonid wrote: > >>On June 02, 2001 at 23:54:08, leonid wrote: >> >>>Hi! >>> >>>If you would like to solve some easy mate then try this: >>> >>>[D]qqnqBB2/rqqNQQ2/kqQQQRnK/rqqNQR2/bbqQQQ2/8/8/8 w - - > >Hello Loenid, > >First it is "easy", then it is for champions... and after nearly 30 hours >my K7/600 has not even finished depth 8! Geez! What exactly is easy about >this one? Chest obviously does not get it. Chessmaster(ss=10) gets it It says that Nxc5+ is mate in 9 in 5 seconds on PIII850 It also needs time to finish depth 8 but it has no problem to finish it. depth 4 is enough to see mate in 9 and the evaluation does not change at depthes 5-8 It needs 3:46 to get the same score for Nxc5+ at depth 8. > > >>>I know that at Sunday we have more people coming to this place that usual. So, >>>if you will find previous position just too little for you, then go with the >>>next: >>> >>>[D]1Q1qq1Q1/2rnnr2/1rBkqBr1/2pbbp2/1NPPPN2/Q2R2Q1/2RKR3/1q3q2 w - - > >Well, I thought I'll try this second one, before the first is ready, but: >there is no mate in 10, here (K7/600, 350 MB hash, 30 minutes). >Does not look like an "easy" one, either. The mate for champions is clearly more easy. Chessmaster6000(ss=10) says mate in 12 in 1 second at depth 4. The solution begins with 1.Bxe5+ Chessmaster does not change it's mind even after finishing depth 8. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.