Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:02:39 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 08:46:18, Marc van Hal wrote: >Actually an misunderstanding was indeed, that you have to be smart to be a good >chess players. If you're not intelligent and don't have a very good memory for patterns, then forget getting a strong chessplayer. If i train kids and see a kid that's not so intelligent, then usually despite sometimes extra training and better motivation they do not come far. Most chessplayers are so extremely lazy that you forget that they're intelligent, and yes intelligent people, what we define as being intelligent at least, that's not the same as knowing how much a car costs. >This is not always, the fact neither. >You have many gm's. >Who play mostly on intuition, rather then on deep calculations. >The intuition of chess programs is different depends on how it is programmed >(of course you can't call this intuition but something which looks like it). >But you have to admit that positional moves are the greatest difficulty for all >programs >And that maybe it is precisely here where neural networks could help! >It doesn’t necessarily, have to be only neural net works from the start. >But a combination >The switch is not that big then >And when this succeeded a full Neural Networks chess program.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.