Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:33:06 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 00:16:18, william penn wrote: > > > HOW can this grandmaster make this claim based on one game? Sounds to me like >he is one of those group of grandmasters that are threatened by the growing >strength of computers. By the way Gm Dreev after drawing this same deep shredder >says that it would get a highier elo than 2500 if it competes in fide >tournaments. Who's opinion would you take a 2541 grandmaster or a 2650 elo Gm >who has played more than one game, but many games at 40/2, so far he has played >three 40/2 games vs deep shredder. Go to the rebel page and you will hear other >grandmasters say the same thing. I am willing to bet that this grandmaster that >you played, has a certain system he uses regulary to beat computers, so he >basically wins the same type of game more than once. This has nothing to do with >chess strength, for if the computer was conscious it would avoid such lines > You are typically "missing the point." A 2600 Human would _never_ play moves like Shredder did. _never_. A computer can play a 2800 game one time, and a 2100 game the next time. A 2600 human will never do that. Both will make an occasional blunder, to be sure. But _no_ human rated even 1800 would play some of those moves Shredder played. you can't be a 2600 player if you play 1600-level moves from time to time. It just won't work.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.