Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Beating MTD(n,f)

Author: Dan Andersson

Date: 13:03:22 06/05/01

>
>I'm not personally convinced that mtd(f) is any better (or worse) in _real_
>positions where the score fluctuates normally, of course.

I agree, it's hard to prove its superior to PVS-negasout. But in calm
positions/parts of games it has its ups. But it's really easy to implement time
management code for fail high/low in the driver part of the code.

Regards Dan Andersson

Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Vincent Diepeveen 16:42:08 06/05/01
- Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Dan Andersson 02:05:28 06/06/01
  - Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:25:40 06/06/01
    - Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Dan Andersson 08:51:58 06/06/01
    - Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Vincent Diepeveen 06:06:40 06/06/01
      - Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 07:32:14 06/06/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Tony Werten 03:52:07 06/07/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:07:16 06/08/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Robert Hyatt 14:16:21 06/07/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Dann Corbit 13:04:49 06/07/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Tony Werten 00:44:44 06/08/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Dan Newman 02:06:25 06/08/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Tony Werten 03:45:40 06/08/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Dan Andersson 09:46:06 06/08/01
        
        Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Miguel A. Ballicora 08:08:04 06/08/01
      - Re: Beating MTD(n,f) Andrew Williams 07:12:36 06/06/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.