Author: Chris Carson
Date: 14:44:23 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 17:28:29, william penn wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 16:08:39, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On June 05, 2001 at 15:45:19, william penn wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> I have an account on icc running on a athlon 1000, i will play a six game match >>>against any who wants to get quirrely, i am telling you to 'jump". >>> >>> TO THE GUY THAT CREATED THE CM SETTING, I AM CALLING YOU OUT, I WANT YOU TO >>>SHOW US PUBLICLY THE 30 % YOU BOAST ABOUT. JUST SENT ME AN EMAIL AND WE CAN SET >>>UP THE TIME AND PUBLISH THE GAMES HERE, I WILL BE USING DEEP FRITZ6 >> >>Interesting challenge. You may want to think about mandating someway to >>ensure you are playing the person and not a computer or computer assisted >>person. The time control is important, at fast time controls, I can easily >>ambush a program in a short match, I suggest 40/2. Finally, I suggest you >>require proof of a rating. A "current" rating is needed, many people sandbag >>their ratings (USCF has discussed this at length). >> >>I am sure I have missed a lot, so be careful. >> >>Best Regards, > > >>Chris Carson > > Aginst deepfritz preparation is irrelevant unless your atleast 2500, but i am >speaking to these experts who are saying they can beat the computers 30 percent, >i think the grandmasters have more sense then this, having played hundreds of >games like kaspy and kramnick, note kaspy knows what they can do, as well as >kramnik, kaspy dodged the frankfurt tourney, showing computers respect, whereas >in the past he took on all comers, kramnnik needs three months to prepare, and >this is all for according to hyatt international master level computers, how >stupid can a person be, not to see how rediculous this is?????? >A PHD is this dumb. the problem with so-called brilliant people is that they >lack common sense. William, I may disagree with Dr. Hyatt, however, I think he is a smart man. He has his resons and is entitled to his opinion. For me, an opposing opinion is not "stupid" even if I do not agree with the logic or reasons the person holds those opinions. I have been intolerant of other points of view in the past and that usually leads to conflict and sometimes I realize that I might have been wrong, but the damage has already been done. Who knows, maybe soon someone will find a way to beat the programs 60% or more of the time for any 2100 player or lower rating. I do not think so, but in an infinite universe... ;) Best of luck with your challenge. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.