Author: william penn
Date: 14:49:38 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 17:41:53, william penn wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 17:36:48, John Dahlem wrote: > >>On June 05, 2001 at 17:28:29, william penn wrote: >> >>>On June 05, 2001 at 16:08:39, Chris Carson wrote: >>> >>>>On June 05, 2001 at 15:45:19, william penn wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have an account on icc running on a athlon 1000, i will play a six game match >>>>>against any who wants to get quirrely, i am telling you to 'jump". >>>>> >>>>> TO THE GUY THAT CREATED THE CM SETTING, I AM CALLING YOU OUT, I WANT YOU TO >>>>>SHOW US PUBLICLY THE 30 % YOU BOAST ABOUT. JUST SENT ME AN EMAIL AND WE CAN SET >>>>>UP THE TIME AND PUBLISH THE GAMES HERE, I WILL BE USING DEEP FRITZ6 >>>> >>>>Interesting challenge. You may want to think about mandating someway to >>>>ensure you are playing the person and not a computer or computer assisted >>>>person. The time control is important, at fast time controls, I can easily >>>>ambush a program in a short match, I suggest 40/2. Finally, I suggest you >>>>require proof of a rating. A "current" rating is needed, many people sandbag >>>>their ratings (USCF has discussed this at length). >>>> >>>>I am sure I have missed a lot, so be careful. >>>> >>>>Best Regards, >>> >>> >>>>Chris Carson >>> >>> Aginst deepfritz preparation is irrelevant unless your atleast 2500, but i am >>>speaking to these experts who are saying they can beat the computers 30 percent, >>>i think the grandmasters have more sense then this, having played hundreds of >>>games like kaspy and kramnick, note kaspy knows what they can do, as well as >>>kramnik, kaspy dodged the frankfurt tourney, showing computers respect, whereas >>>in the past he took on all comers, kramnnik needs three months to prepare, and >>>this is all for according to hyatt international master level computers, how >>>stupid can a person be, not to see how rediculous this is?????? >>>A PHD is this dumb. the problem with so-called brilliant people is that they >>>lack common sense. >> >> >>Do you realize Hyatt has spent a large portion of his life in computer chess, >>and is probably a good authority on these matters (better, even, than you)? I >>believe he said around 2400 elo anyway, that is very strong, and not far at all >>from GM. I think a 2400 elo player has good chances against GMs, especially if >>they do not do anything to neutralize his great tactical ability. One problem >>with computers is that just about any GM can beat them if they take the time to >>study anti-computer techniques. >> >>John > > >Yes i realize he is a computer scientist, but he is not God, and contrary to >alot of people here, i beg to disagree with him, at hest he is a MEDIOCRY >PROGRAMMER. Crafty has never been number one in anything. Cray Blitz has never >won a world computer championship. NONE Sorry i accidently hit the submit key before i was finsihed, anyone back to hyatt, what has he accomplished in computer chess, other than making a program freely availabe to the public, and answering questions on RGCC, yet you would think by the responses of people here that he was the world's best programmer, he is just a little man with a huge ego. IF you want to mention some good programmers than mention hzu and richard lang, ed shoeder, christopher theron, amir ban, these guys have won something, yet they are too modest to stand out like hyatt who has done nothing. OH i forgot the programmer of shredder.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.