Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:06:21 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 17:36:48, John Dahlem wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 17:28:29, william penn wrote: > >>On June 05, 2001 at 16:08:39, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>On June 05, 2001 at 15:45:19, william penn wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have an account on icc running on a athlon 1000, i will play a six game match >>>>against any who wants to get quirrely, i am telling you to 'jump". >>>> >>>> TO THE GUY THAT CREATED THE CM SETTING, I AM CALLING YOU OUT, I WANT YOU TO >>>>SHOW US PUBLICLY THE 30 % YOU BOAST ABOUT. JUST SENT ME AN EMAIL AND WE CAN SET >>>>UP THE TIME AND PUBLISH THE GAMES HERE, I WILL BE USING DEEP FRITZ6 >>> >>>Interesting challenge. You may want to think about mandating someway to >>>ensure you are playing the person and not a computer or computer assisted >>>person. The time control is important, at fast time controls, I can easily >>>ambush a program in a short match, I suggest 40/2. Finally, I suggest you >>>require proof of a rating. A "current" rating is needed, many people sandbag >>>their ratings (USCF has discussed this at length). >>> >>>I am sure I have missed a lot, so be careful. >>> >>>Best Regards, >> >> >>>Chris Carson >> >> Aginst deepfritz preparation is irrelevant unless your atleast 2500, but i am >>speaking to these experts who are saying they can beat the computers 30 percent, >>i think the grandmasters have more sense then this, having played hundreds of >>games like kaspy and kramnick, note kaspy knows what they can do, as well as >>kramnik, kaspy dodged the frankfurt tourney, showing computers respect, whereas >>in the past he took on all comers, kramnnik needs three months to prepare, and >>this is all for according to hyatt international master level computers, how >>stupid can a person be, not to see how rediculous this is?????? >>A PHD is this dumb. the problem with so-called brilliant people is that they >>lack common sense. > > >Do you realize Hyatt has spent a large portion of his life in computer chess, >and is probably a good authority on these matters (better, even, than you)? I >believe he said around 2400 elo anyway, that is very strong, and not far at all >from GM. I think a 2400 elo player has good chances against GMs, especially if >they do not do anything to neutralize his great tactical ability. One problem >with computers is that just about any GM can beat them if they take the time to >study anti-computer techniques. I do not believe in it. Rebel beated a GM in a 6 game match so not every GM can beat them by anti-computer techniques. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.