Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:55:02 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 18:06:21, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 17:36:48, John Dahlem wrote: >[snip] >>Do you realize Hyatt has spent a large portion of his life in computer chess, >>and is probably a good authority on these matters (better, even, than you)? I >>believe he said around 2400 elo anyway, that is very strong, and not far at all >>from GM. I think a 2400 elo player has good chances against GMs, especially if >>they do not do anything to neutralize his great tactical ability. One problem >>with computers is that just about any GM can beat them if they take the time to >>study anti-computer techniques. > >I do not believe in it. > >Rebel beated a GM in a 6 game match so not >every GM can beat them by anti-computer techniques. In that match, did the GM use anticomputer techniques or simply play whatever style was natural? I have found that some GM's are unbelievably, profoundly ignorant of anti-computer techniques (and others are very saavy to them).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.