Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 15:56:50 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 18:14:16, william penn wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 18:05:43, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On June 05, 2001 at 17:49:38, william penn wrote: >> >>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:41:53, william penn wrote: >>> >>>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:36:48, John Dahlem wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:28:29, william penn wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 16:08:39, Chris Carson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 15:45:19, william penn wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have an account on icc running on a athlon 1000, i will play a six game match >>>>>>>>against any who wants to get quirrely, i am telling you to 'jump". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TO THE GUY THAT CREATED THE CM SETTING, I AM CALLING YOU OUT, I WANT YOU TO >>>>>>>>SHOW US PUBLICLY THE 30 % YOU BOAST ABOUT. JUST SENT ME AN EMAIL AND WE CAN SET >>>>>>>>UP THE TIME AND PUBLISH THE GAMES HERE, I WILL BE USING DEEP FRITZ6 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Interesting challenge. You may want to think about mandating someway to >>>>>>>ensure you are playing the person and not a computer or computer assisted >>>>>>>person. The time control is important, at fast time controls, I can easily >>>>>>>ambush a program in a short match, I suggest 40/2. Finally, I suggest you >>>>>>>require proof of a rating. A "current" rating is needed, many people sandbag >>>>>>>their ratings (USCF has discussed this at length). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I am sure I have missed a lot, so be careful. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Best Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Chris Carson >>>>>> >>>>>> Aginst deepfritz preparation is irrelevant unless your atleast 2500, but i am >>>>>>speaking to these experts who are saying they can beat the computers 30 percent, >>>>>>i think the grandmasters have more sense then this, having played hundreds of >>>>>>games like kaspy and kramnick, note kaspy knows what they can do, as well as >>>>>>kramnik, kaspy dodged the frankfurt tourney, showing computers respect, whereas >>>>>>in the past he took on all comers, kramnnik needs three months to prepare, and >>>>>>this is all for according to hyatt international master level computers, how >>>>>>stupid can a person be, not to see how rediculous this is?????? >>>>>>A PHD is this dumb. the problem with so-called brilliant people is that they >>>>>>lack common sense. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Do you realize Hyatt has spent a large portion of his life in computer chess, >>>>>and is probably a good authority on these matters (better, even, than you)? I >>>>>believe he said around 2400 elo anyway, that is very strong, and not far at all >>>>>from GM. I think a 2400 elo player has good chances against GMs, especially if >>>>>they do not do anything to neutralize his great tactical ability. One problem >>>>>with computers is that just about any GM can beat them if they take the time to >>>>>study anti-computer techniques. >>>>> >>>>>John >>>> >>>> >>>>Yes i realize he is a computer scientist, but he is not God, and contrary to >>>>alot of people here, i beg to disagree with him, at hest he is a MEDIOCRY >>>>PROGRAMMER. Crafty has never been number one in anything. Cray Blitz has never >>>>won a world computer championship. NONE >>> >>> >>> Sorry i accidently hit the submit key before i was finsihed, anyone back to >>>hyatt, what has he accomplished in computer chess, other than making a program >>>freely availabe to the public, and answering questions on RGCC, yet you would >>>think by the responses of people here that he was the world's best programmer, >>>he is just a little man with a huge ego. IF you want to mention some good >>>programmers than mention hzu and richard lang, ed shoeder, christopher theron, >>>amir ban, these guys have won something, yet they are too modest to stand out >>>like hyatt who has done nothing. OH i forgot the programmer of shredder. >> >>Sometimes i really have to laugh and now is as good a time as ever HA HA HA, >>what is wrong with you? Hyatt is a brilliant programmer who makes a program that >>has enjoyed tremendous succes over the years and he has EARNED the respect of >>many people here, i knew of his name before any of the commercial programmers, >>no offence just stating a fact, i admit i do not know Hyatt personally, but when >>i have asked him a question he has always taken the time to reply, EVERY time >>and he has always been polite and polite being the key word here you might learn >>a lesson or two from your behaviour here. >>Maby you should go to chessclub.com and write "fi scrappy" and you will see >>something remarkable, don't take my word for it "just mooh it" :-) >>scrappy is infact crafty (latest ver.) setup to play human players GM's and IM's >>included and as far as i know scrappy is the highest rated program against >>human's!! >> >>Regards >>Jonas > > >So when did "being polite", and "taking the time to answer questions" amount to >being a good programmer who should be listened to?????:, in your response you >just gave me the key to understanding why someone who has accomplished so little >in computer chess has gotten so much respect.I AM SPEAKING COMPARATIVELY >OFCOURSE. Well good for you ;-) let's see how far you get with that attitude. hasta la nunca tio. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.