Author: william penn
Date: 16:25:08 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 18:55:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 18:06:21, Uri Blass wrote: >>On June 05, 2001 at 17:36:48, John Dahlem wrote: >>[snip] >>>Do you realize Hyatt has spent a large portion of his life in computer chess, >>>and is probably a good authority on these matters (better, even, than you)? I >>>believe he said around 2400 elo anyway, that is very strong, and not far at all >>>from GM. I think a 2400 elo player has good chances against GMs, especially if >>>they do not do anything to neutralize his great tactical ability. One problem >>>with computers is that just about any GM can beat them if they take the time to >>>study anti-computer techniques. >> >>I do not believe in it. >> >>Rebel beated a GM in a 6 game match so not >>every GM can beat them by anti-computer techniques. > >In that match, did the GM use anticomputer techniques or simply play whatever >style was natural? I have found that some GM's are unbelievably, profoundly >ignorant of anti-computer techniques (and others are very saavy to them). Dan this is Rediculous and you know it, I thought you were a smart man???? how do you think Van der Wiel was undefeated against all computers until his match with Rebel???? So you think he used the anti computer strategy against all the other computers, but suddenly when he got to rebel he left his brain behind????come on pal, your suppose to be a man of science this is rediculous. IT
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.