Author: Chris Carson
Date: 17:43:22 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2001 at 20:09:31, Jonathan Lee wrote: >On June 05, 2001 at 15:17:16, william penn wrote: > >> >> >> I WOULD Love to see all the games lost by Computers since the pent 200 against >>Gm and international masters, i bet there is only a handful, yet some say the >>programs are not Gm Strength, Ludicrous. Very prejudicial > >Would you like to have about 7 games grandmasters have won at least 4 gigahertz? >They include Junior (5.6 GHZ) at tournament time you requested (2 games). >(1 Game) by Kasparov from Deeper Blue in 1997. (Deep Blue in 1996 doesn't >count.) >(3 or 4 Games (I forgot how many)) on (Game in 30 minutes) by Fritz (4 GHZ). > >Does anybody know more games on expensive hardware? > >After all the future of chess programming can be eyed on those handful of games. >I did a pattern recognition on the common deminator of those games. >1. No piece or pawn taken in the first ten moves. >2. Almost all the closed openings are different from each other. >3. The game was decisive (such as material advantage or checkmate) before the >50th move. >4. Grandmasters use a queen on all games. (The decisive queen is the one in >the starting position meaning not from promoted pawns.) >5. Grandmasters win as white twice as many times as black. >Jonathan (132 message) Interesting analysis. Number 4 was one that I had not noticed, I personally do not care if the queen is on the board or not when I play, however, I plan to look into this possible weakness for my program, this must generate a lot more possible moves per ply for the computer to analyze, makes some sense. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.