Author: stuart taylor
Date: 17:56:13 06/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2001 at 20:41:52, stuart taylor wrote: >Every aspect apart from what is needed for the program to think for itself, if >cut out during tests, would be most interesting for the chess loving consumer, I >think. This certainly applies to the opening books, except for pattern >recognition purposes. > Others bells and whistles can be added later, and even retested. Even if the >testing seems much more cumbersome, in truth, it speaks much much more per 100 >games than the normal mass-production games, which is simply idiotic, in many >ways, I think. >I mean e.g. >Program A vs Program B both with books off 20 games >Program A books off vs. program B books on 20 games >Program A books on vs. program B books on 20 games >Program A books on vs program B books off 20 games >even though this is only 80 games, it shows much much more than 100 games with >only both books on. >S.Taylor TOO COMPLICATED? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.