Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A open challenge to those that think computers are only 2100-22000

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:31:30 06/05/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 05, 2001 at 18:07:37, william penn wrote:

>On June 05, 2001 at 17:44:23, Chris Carson wrote:
>
>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:28:29, william penn wrote:
>>
>>>On June 05, 2001 at 16:08:39, Chris Carson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 15:45:19, william penn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an account on icc running on a athlon 1000, i will play a six game match
>>>>>against any who wants to get quirrely, i am telling you to 'jump".
>>>>>
>>>>> TO THE GUY THAT CREATED THE CM SETTING, I AM CALLING YOU OUT, I WANT YOU TO
>>>>>SHOW US PUBLICLY THE 30 % YOU BOAST ABOUT. JUST SENT ME AN EMAIL AND WE CAN SET
>>>>>UP THE TIME AND PUBLISH THE GAMES HERE, I WILL BE USING DEEP FRITZ6
>>>>
>>>>Interesting challenge.  You may want to think about mandating someway to
>>>>ensure you are playing the person and not a computer or computer assisted
>>>>person.  The time control is important, at fast time controls, I can easily
>>>>ambush a program in a short match, I suggest 40/2.  Finally, I suggest you
>>>>require proof of a rating.  A "current" rating is needed, many people sandbag
>>>>their ratings (USCF has discussed this at length).
>>>>
>>>>I am sure I have missed a lot, so be careful.
>>>>
>>>>Best Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>>Chris Carson
>>>
>>> Aginst deepfritz preparation is irrelevant unless your atleast 2500, but i am
>>>speaking to these experts who are saying they can beat the computers 30 percent,
>>>i think the grandmasters have more sense then this, having played hundreds of
>>>games like kaspy and kramnick, note kaspy knows what they can do, as well as
>>>kramnik, kaspy dodged the frankfurt tourney, showing computers respect, whereas
>>>in the past he took on all comers, kramnnik needs three months to prepare, and
>>>this is all for according to hyatt international master level computers, how
>>>stupid can a person be, not to see how rediculous this is??????
>>>A PHD is this dumb. the problem with so-called brilliant people is that they
>>>lack common sense.
>>
>>William,
>>
>>I may disagree with Dr. Hyatt, however, I think he is a smart man.  He
>>has his resons and is entitled to his opinion.  For me, an opposing
>>opinion is not "stupid" even if I do not agree with the logic or reasons
>>the person holds those opinions.  I have been intolerant of other points
>>of view in the past and that usually leads to conflict and sometimes I
>>realize that I might have been wrong, but the damage has already been done.
>>Who knows, maybe soon someone will find a way to beat the programs 60% or
>>more of the time for any 2100 player or lower rating.  I do not think so,
>>but in an infinite universe...   ;)
>>
>>Best of luck with your challenge.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Chris Carson
>
>
>  I don't think he is stupid either, I just think he is stubborn, i have been
>reading Dr. hyatt for three years and have yet to hear him say he is wrong about
>anthing. NOT to say i give a fat rat's ass either way.


Then why not take your ranting back to Canada and keep it there?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.