Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 08:24:49 06/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2001 at 09:29:21, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 06, 2001 at 08:44:25, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 06, 2001 at 04:22:34, Tanya Deborah wrote: >> >>> >>>Hi to all! >>> >>>I have 2 questions. >>> >>>The match against GM Robert Huebner will be very interesting! and i think that >>>it will be like a preparation for the match against World Champion Kramnik. >>> >>> >>>But what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz for the match against Huebner?? >>>and how many time will be the games?? >>> >>> >>>Also, Somebody know what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz to play against >>>Kramnik??? >>> >>> I can´t see any information about the -kind of machines they will use (Mhz, >>>Ram? etc)in the Chessbase page. >>> >>>Too, i believe that Deep Fritz is a bit better, (running in 8 procesor machine) >>>than Deep Blue 97 version...(the same that won against Kasparov) Is this >>>right? >>> >>>I need that Chessbase will need a lot of hard work! if they want to repeat like >>>IBM did against Kasparov in 1997. Anyway i think that it is very very difficult >>>that it happen again. It will be a Dream! >>> >>> >>>Thanks... >>> >>>Best Regards! >>> >>> >>>Tanya >>> Deborah. >> >> >>I thought only two questions?;-) >> >>Well I can answer _One_ question with over a 99% probability of bieng correct! >>Deep Blue of 1997 would demolish DeepFritz7 on a 8 processor machine regardless >>of of Mhz/Ghz per cpu and cache of today. > >99% of being correct. >I do not know how did you get this conclusion. > >My impression from looking at the logfiles of deep blue is different. > >I believe that Deep Fritz is slightly better. > >Here is a possible test that may be interesting to do. > >1)take all the positions that deeper blue analyzed in the games Deeper >blue-kasparov(position when deep blue to move and positions when Deeper blue >pondered and not pondered correctly) >2)Give Deep Fritz 24 hours to calculate these positions. >3)Delete all the positions when Deep Fritz does not suggest Deep blue's move >after 24 hours because we do not know which program of the two is right. >4)compare the time that Deep Fritz needed to find the move with the time that >Deeper blue needed to find the move in the games against kasparov. > >Uri Hey, Uri I may be wrong? However I don't have the necessary hardware to do your test. I will tell you that _I_ have put DeepFritz6 away in a Sicilian Dragon in only 24 moves. The reason is simple, it was a game in 25 min., I was White and DeepFritz didn't "understand" the position. Also it was running on a single processor of only 500Mhz. I don't have the game score or I'd produce it. But it died in a classical K-Side attack. I couldn't do that to Deeper Blue of 1997. Not by a longshot! Regards, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.