Author: Chris Carson
Date: 08:56:32 06/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2001 at 11:25:58, Bo Persson wrote: >On June 06, 2001 at 07:13:00, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On June 06, 2001 at 04:22:34, Tanya Deborah wrote: >> >>> >>>Hi to all! >>> >>>I have 2 questions. >>> >>>The match against GM Robert Huebner will be very interesting! and i think that >>>it will be like a preparation for the match against World Champion Kramnik. >>> >>> >>>But what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz for the match against Huebner?? >>>and how many time will be the games?? >>> >>> >>>Also, Somebody know what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz to play against >>>Kramnik??? >>> >>> I can´t see any information about the -kind of machines they will use (Mhz, >>>Ram? etc)in the Chessbase page. >>> >>>Too, i believe that Deep Fritz is a bit better, (running in 8 procesor machine) >>>than Deep Blue 97 version...(the same that won against Kasparov) Is this >>>right? >>> >>>I need that Chessbase will need a lot of hard work! if they want to repeat like >>>IBM did against Kasparov in 1997. Anyway i think that it is very very difficult >>>that it happen again. It will be a Dream! >>> >>> >>>Thanks... >>> >>>Best Regards! >>> >>> >>>Tanya >>> Deborah. >> >>Tanya, >> >>Not sure I can add anything more than the other posts. I can only speak >>about results and Deep Fritz has not given a performance greater than >>DB97 yet. My opinion is that Deep Junior on a 8xPIII 1GHZ would be very >>close to DB97 performance, this may also be true for Deep Fritz, Deep Shredder, >>Chess Tiger (smp or single), Rebel Century (smp or single), Hiarcs, and perhaps >>others. >> >>If the same match conditions for DB97 could be set up, then my opinion is that >>an equivelant 8xPIII 2GHZ could produce superior results than DB97. However, >>the PIV does not appear to provide equal GHZ to GHZ performance with the PIII >>and I doubt that the PIII will ever get to 2GHZ. >> >>The Deep Fritz match is much tougher "match conditions", so it will be >>interesting. :) >> >>Finally, we will never know. DB97 no longer plays so all comparison is >>speculation and any future DB chip by HSU will be superior to DB97, in my >>opinion. :) > >Why do you think Hsu/IBM would use the DB97? What if they set up a DB-2001?? Read teh three lines above your statement again. I had already stated that any future DB chip by HSU will be superioer to DB97. We already agree. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson > >The then "massively parallell" 32-node IBM RS/6000 SP is now available in >"standard" configuration 64, 80 and 128 node versions: > >http://www.rs6000.ibm.com/resource/aix_resource/sp_books/hardware/planguide1/da709mst16.html#HDRTWOSW > >Note also: "...more than 128 nodes are available. Consult your IBM >representative...". :-) > >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson > > >Bo Persson >bop@malmo.mail.telia.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.