Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 12:53:57 06/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2001 at 13:59:25, Joshua Lee wrote: >Take All important games against humans where the computer lost, Let the program >analyze untill it finds the better moves note how much time and which processor >you used and start dividing untill the time gets close to 180 seconds , note how >many times you divided and by what number preferably 2 or 3 and when you have a >raw number divide that by 5.9 and you have your answer for example : Deep >Fritz Played against Germany and lost, the hardware was a dual 800 or roughly >1.360Ghz I have Fritz 6 so this will not be exact but i have heard that DF is >around twice as fast as F6 on the same hardware but that isn't too important >unless you are wondering how fast you would need for fritz 6. Deep Fritz used 1 >hour for it's moves it was lost around move 33 so you let fritz sit on previous >moves untill it finds an improvement and you note how much time it needs and >viola. Now this does seem very time consuming and it is as you have this game >the two from the dutch championship, and the hour game against Boris Alterman if >you have a fast enough computer you will see that there DF doesn't run on enough >processors to aviod similar situations if it had a unix or linux counterpart >than Chessbase should put it on a Compaq SC series with 512 Alpha's running at >833Mhz each , These pups are faster than a 1.7Ghz P4 the new Xeon's may be as >fast if not a little faster but unless you beowolfed them they are only >available in dual versions. > >a 512 Processor version would be around 610Ghz and Search 6Ply deeper than your >avarage 800Mhz Computer
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.