Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A open challenge to those that think computers are only 2100-22000

Author: Chessfun

Date: 16:12:23 06/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 06, 2001 at 03:12:55, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On June 05, 2001 at 18:24:37, william penn wrote:
>
>>On June 05, 2001 at 18:00:30, Chris Carson wrote:
>>
>>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:49:38, william penn wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:41:53, william penn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:36:48, John Dahlem wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 17:28:29, william penn wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 16:08:39, Chris Carson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On June 05, 2001 at 15:45:19, william penn wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have an account on icc running on a athlon 1000, i will play a six game match
>>>>>>>>>against any who wants to get quirrely, i am telling you to 'jump".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TO THE GUY THAT CREATED THE CM SETTING, I AM CALLING YOU OUT, I WANT YOU TO
>>>>>>>>>SHOW US PUBLICLY THE 30 % YOU BOAST ABOUT. JUST SENT ME AN EMAIL AND WE CAN SET
>>>>>>>>>UP THE TIME AND PUBLISH THE GAMES HERE, I WILL BE USING DEEP FRITZ6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Interesting challenge.  You may want to think about mandating someway to
>>>>>>>>ensure you are playing the person and not a computer or computer assisted
>>>>>>>>person.  The time control is important, at fast time controls, I can easily
>>>>>>>>ambush a program in a short match, I suggest 40/2.  Finally, I suggest you
>>>>>>>>require proof of a rating.  A "current" rating is needed, many people sandbag
>>>>>>>>their ratings (USCF has discussed this at length).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I am sure I have missed a lot, so be careful.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Best Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Chris Carson
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aginst deepfritz preparation is irrelevant unless your atleast 2500, but i am
>>>>>>>speaking to these experts who are saying they can beat the computers 30 percent,
>>>>>>>i think the grandmasters have more sense then this, having played hundreds of
>>>>>>>games like kaspy and kramnick, note kaspy knows what they can do, as well as
>>>>>>>kramnik, kaspy dodged the frankfurt tourney, showing computers respect, whereas
>>>>>>>in the past he took on all comers, kramnnik needs three months to prepare, and
>>>>>>>this is all for according to hyatt international master level computers, how
>>>>>>>stupid can a person be, not to see how rediculous this is??????
>>>>>>>A PHD is this dumb. the problem with so-called brilliant people is that they
>>>>>>>lack common sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Do you realize Hyatt has spent a large portion of his life in computer chess,
>>>>>>and is probably a good authority on these matters (better, even, than you)? I
>>>>>>believe he said around 2400 elo anyway, that is very strong, and not far at all
>>>>>>from GM.  I think a 2400 elo player has good chances against GMs, especially if
>>>>>>they do not do anything to neutralize his great tactical ability.  One problem
>>>>>>with computers is that just about any GM can beat them if they take the time to
>>>>>>study anti-computer techniques.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes i realize he is a computer scientist, but he is not God, and contrary to
>>>>>alot of people here, i beg to disagree with him, at hest he is a MEDIOCRY
>>>>>PROGRAMMER.  Crafty has never been number one in anything. Cray Blitz has never
>>>>>won a world computer championship. NONE
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry i accidently hit the submit key before i was finsihed, anyone back to
>>>>hyatt, what has he accomplished in computer chess, other than making a program
>>>>freely availabe to the public, and answering questions on RGCC, yet you would
>>>>think by the responses of people here that he was the world's best programmer,
>>>>he is just a little man with a huge ego. IF you want to mention some good
>>>>programmers than mention hzu and richard lang, ed shoeder, christopher theron,
>>>>amir ban, these guys have won something, yet they are too modest to stand out
>>>>like hyatt who has done nothing. OH i forgot the programmer of shredder.
>>>
>>>Crafty has won some tournament, Shep has published tournament wins
>>>and rating lists such as SSDF and Frank's page show crafty to be strong
>>>against other programs.  Crafty also won an event against humans (college
>>>team) some years back, but I could never get the PGN's.  It was reported in
>>>Chess Life.  Believe me, I would love to add these games to my list, I think
>>>Crafty may have scored over 2500 against rated players on a PPro200.  Anyone
>>>have these or can you quote the actual results against average rating?
>>>
>>>Cray Blitz won the World Computer Chess Championship in 1983 and 1986.
>>>
>>>Dr. Hyatt has published many articles on chess programming.
>>>
>>>I may disagree with Dr. Hyatt from time to time, but I also have to
>>>admire his accomplishments.  :)
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>Chris Carson
>>
>>
>>i DON'T think it has anything to do with accomplishment's, i think what sums it
>>up is the old chinese proverb says whoever speaks the loudest, is the one most
>>often heard.  HYATT
>
>It's possible to take issue with a lot of what he says.  I've been in arguments
>where I think he's wrong, and that's pretty tough.
>
>On the other hand, his contributions are very significant.  His articles in the
>ICCAJ are excellent.  Some of the old stuff regarding Cray Blitz was extremely
>helpful to me when I was starting my own program.  This is to say nothing of his
>work here, on ICC, via email, etc.
>
>I understand why some people (not necessarily you) have trouble with Bob, but he
>needs to be given his due.  He's the most generous person around here.  He is a
>very prolific helper, and people like that accumulate friends.
>
>bruce


As usual very well put.

Sarah.






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.