Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 22:57:48 06/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2001 at 07:59:53, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On June 06, 2001 at 04:22:34, Tanya Deborah wrote: > >> >>Hi to all! >> >>I have 2 questions. >> >>The match against GM Robert Huebner will be very interesting! and i think that >>it will be like a preparation for the match against World Champion Kramnik. > >This is news for me. a match versus Huebner. >What level and how many games? > >> >>But what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz for the match against Huebner?? > >I don't think that matters too much with the search depths that Fritz >already gets. > >>and how many time will be the games?? > >Good question. Usually they do 15 minutes a game to have a chance to >beat the GM. As a GM i would never agree on having 30 minutes, but well >they see it different; as an opportunity to earn money without losing >anything if they lose. > >>Also, Somebody know what kind of machine will use Deep Fritz to play against >>Kramnik??? > >whether it's 4 processors or 8 processors that's not real interesting. > >For sure it's a fast machine, but it would be cool if chessbase releases >the logfiles of the games short after the match. > >> I can´t see any information about the -kind of machines they will use (Mhz, >>Ram? etc)in the Chessbase page. > >If it's a 8 processor then the fastest machine you can get is > 8 x 700Mhz. > >That's 5.6Ghz together. > >>Too, i believe that Deep Fritz is a bit better, (running in 8 procesor machine) >>than Deep Blue 97 version...(the same that won against Kasparov) Is this >>right? > >I wouldn't give a penny for Deep Blue playing fritz or any other program >of today. > >The weakest chain of fritz isn't so weak that you can easily beat it >with a gnuchess searching 11 ply and an automatic generated book that's >a bit hand tuned by a GM who knew shit from computerchess, but of course >like everyone a lot from kasparov. > >>I need that Chessbase will need a lot of hard work! if they want to repeat like >>IBM did against Kasparov in 1997. Anyway i think that it is very very difficult >>that it happen again. It will be a Dream! > >Kasparov should be shot for that match yes. This match will be very boring. >Kramnik wins a few games and either he's so confident that he tries to win >the others too, or he takes a few draws for a sure match win. > >That's what i would expect. > >The only risk Kramnik can run is if he plays berlin defense. Fritz will >play berlin defense with white hell better as kasparov ever did. > Hi Vincent! How do you know that Deep Fritz, play better with White in the Berlin Defense?? Do you please can post here some games?? >Kasparov did get some great chances in all games he ever played against >the berlin defense, but in the end then kasparov didn't push forward >too hard. Kasparov is the biggest player ever if queens are on the >board and the position isn't technical but sharp and home prepared... > >Kramnik is probably the most boring player in the top 5 of the world, >but without doubt worlds best player, because in chess you can FORCE >your opponent to get a technical and strategic position. > >This is why kasparov lost from Kramnik. This is why fritz will lose >chanceless from Kramnik. Fritz only hope would be seeing something in >a deep line which gives it a positional advantage, which kramnik >missed. However the evaluation in fritz isn't sufficient for that. > >Diep would've been a better choice there. > >> >>Thanks... >> >>Best Regards! >> >> >>Tanya >> Deborah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.