Author: Albert Silver
Date: 11:34:25 06/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2001 at 13:53:10, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On June 07, 2001 at 12:29:41, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On June 07, 2001 at 05:52:51, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>Yes I know all test suites are almost useless to finds the best playing chess
>>>software. But still, which suite is the less bad in your opinion? If You can
>>>only use one test suite before starting real games, which suite will you select?
>>>Is it still LCT II?
>>>
>>>I wonder why WAC suite is still discussed here. It's too easy, when most
>>>programs score 299/300 with 1 min level. Or may be 297/298 is they have null
>>>move problems. But in any case You don't get any info by running WAC...
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>Clearly ECM, if your program is strong enough to find the stuff. If not, then
>>WAC. But if you start getting 280-290 on WAC, it's time to go to ECM.
>>
>>This is for tactical stuff. For positional stuff, you'd do okay to just eyeball
>>it.
>
>ECM has an awful lot of bugs in it. That is something that potential users
>should be aware of.
Why not just create a revised version of it for testing purposes?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.