Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:50:32 06/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2001 at 13:51:05, John Merlino wrote: >On June 07, 2001 at 10:41:29, leonid wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>This position is not that difficult, not even deep. Only reason for saying that >>it is for "good program" is the few other positions, very close to this, were >>solved only by Heiner mate solver. >> >>[D]qQrq4/BPNB4/nqqQ4/kqbbNRRK/nqqQ4/PqPP4/qQrQ4/8 w - - >> >>Please indicate your result. >> >>Thanks, >>Leonid. > >Well, CM8000 announces Mate in 10 in just under 5 minutes on my PIII-600, but I >would be surprised if that was the optimal solution: I am not going to be surprised if mate in 10 is the shortest solution. I believe that in most of the cases when chessmaster says mate in 10 after 5 minutes there is no shorter mate. I have no proof for it but it is my impression based on results that I saw. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.