Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 02:51:55 04/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
Thank you, it's well written and interesting. Your mapping algorithm produces yet another mapping but it seems to me that the differences in mapping are not very important for efficiency. Is DarkThought a finished project or is the program further developed? Peter On April 23, 1998 at 04:50:56, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: >On April 22, 1998 at 16:57:00, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >>There seems to be different definitions of what rotated bitboards really >>are. I'm talking about rotating the diagonals. >> >>What should be called rotated? > >Please take a look at my ICCA Journal 20(3) article "How DarkThought >plays >chess" if you want to know how we do it. A preprint of the article is >available electronically on our "DarkThought" WWW page at URL: > ><http://wwwipd.ira.uka.de/Tichy/DarkThought> > >=Ernst=
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.