Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 06:20:39 06/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2001 at 17:48:45, Rich Van Gaasbeck wrote: >I've never seen anyone say that the Stonewall defence is difficult for computers >to handle. Is that because it is easy for the computer to avoid, or because it >is not as hard to handle when the stonewall formation is on Black's side? This solution is hard to find with theory nowadys used by chess program A perfectly undersandable and good move against the stonewall is 1d4,f5 2.Qd3!? This moves was firts played by Alapin later on anelysed by me and after that published in New in Chess magazine. Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.