Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 13:28:10 06/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2001 at 15:07:05, Laurence Chen wrote: >On June 09, 2001 at 14:31:33, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On June 09, 2001 at 11:13:03, Côme wrote: >> >>>On June 09, 2001 at 10:13:05, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>I also did write, to the organisation of the advanced chess tournament. >>>>When they would invite me, to play such a tournament. >>>>I think strength, is of more importance, then name or title. >>>>I also did write, to the organisation of the advanced chess tournament. >>>>When they would invite me, to play such a tournament. >>>>I think strength, is of more importance, then name or title. >>>> >>>>And I think that I must be one of the advanced players for these kind of >>>>tournaments. >>> >>>Hello ! >>>What is your Fide rating mr van hal ? >>>Best regards >>>Alexandre Côme >> >>Mr Come What my Fide rating is not of importance my strenght in advanced chess >>is what is important here. >>Like you could have seen in the posting. >> >>Friendly greetings Marc van Hal >You are wrong !!! Strength may not be important in long time control games, but >at speed chess, it can be a significant factor. The games are played at a time >control of 20 min. + 15 sec. increment per move, but this does not leave much >time for the computer to do a deep search, so if you are not strong and your >opponent is a super GM, then the chances of you winning is very very small. The >GM is using the computer to check the moves for possible tactical blunders not >to find out what the chess computer suggests is the best move. >Regards, > >Laurence For starters I did not write that strenght is not of importance but Title or name If you think this is/was the way I used computer programs to analyse games your deeply wrong. I always make the plans myself and check if they are correct If this was not the case all my analyses would have been already long refuted which is not the fact. But the combination of a Gm and the computer program is not so good as it sounds. Gm's tent to play there one moves or they make the program do all the work. Both ways of playing are not good. The only correct way is Look carefully at the position and make a plan. then look what the program wants Look if it looks correct If this is not the fact just play what the program wants to play. take all moves back. And make the moves which solves the coming problem For the matter how longer the time control the better it is for me! And the higher the quality of the moves will be Friendly greetings Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.