Author: Ian Osgood
Date: 23:32:25 06/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2001 at 20:08:11, Gordon Rattray wrote: > >Thanks! This is an improvement over PocketChess to say the least! ;-) > >I've not been able to access the features.txt yet. I've got 64Mb on my Ipaq to >play around with, so should I aim for large hash table settings? Or is the >processor too slow to take advantage of these? > >Gordon Good question. I haven't used much other than the default 3M size, except to test the hash option code. I know that Christopher Theron believes that 48K tables are big enough for Tiger on the palm (about 500 nps). PocketCrafty obtains about 5000 nps on an iPAQ, so maybe around 480K is more reasonable. This would be an area you could test and report on if you like! Ian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.