Author: Slater Wold
Date: 23:52:50 06/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2001 at 02:14:50, odell hall wrote: >On June 09, 2001 at 23:56:07, Slater Wold wrote: > >>No. I don't think so. It was only 2 games, and not even tournament length >>games at that. >> >>When I saw how easily Petr defeated Deep Shredder, I was amazed. He was >>kibitz'ing most of the game. Like he didn't even have to concentrate. >> >>Remember, he said that Deep Shredder performance was approx. 2100-2200 FIDE in >>the game against him? (Which it played 100x worse against him, I agree.) Guess >>what Petr said about these games? >> >>Thoughts on ending of game 1: >> >>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: it's very difficult for human to play positions with >>compensations for a pawn >> >>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: may be just white has no sufficient compensation :) >>Project played like Machine :)) >> >>Game 2: >> >>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: 4...Bxc3? >> >>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: I beat Jrlok never play Bxc3 vs human GM :) >> >>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: please think about it :) >> >>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: comp played opening like patzer again >> >>And about the series: >> >>Petrovich(GM) tells you: hmm, comp played like 2200 in the closed position and >>like 2600 in open :) It's hard to evaluate his strength >> >>Petrovich(GM) tells you: so, 2200+2600 / 2 = 2400 :) lol >> >> >> >>Petr and I just went over quickly the games. These are not annotated or >>anything, just general conversation on the games. >> >>Also, please be aware that when I played Petr, I did _NOT_ prepare at all. I >>asked him for a game, and we played. Having been singled out by JRLOK, I >>prepared an better book. This time when I played JRLOK, there was no in & out >>of book problems. >> >>Shredder played a much better game this time around, than last. However, I am >>not ready to say that Shredder is GM strength. Like Robert said, to be 2600 you >>have to play like a 2600 every game. Not 2100 here and 2700 here. 2600 ALL THE >>TIME. >> >>I am planning more and more GM vs Shredder games. Perhaps at the end of this >>year, we can make a FAIR guess at Deep Shredder's ELO. >> >> >>Slate > > > Well if what he said is true, a 2100-22000 just beat roman , one of the >strongest grandmasters in computer chess around, and that is impressive. NO NO NO! He rated my performance against HIM as being about 2100-2200! Just _ONE_ game! There's NO doubt Deep Shredder is stronger, it just had a "bad game." Slate
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.