Author: Chris Carson
Date: 11:53:00 06/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2001 at 14:25:38, Mark Young wrote: >I plugged the Computers vs. Grandmasters results into the program Who is better. >Here are the results. > >I hope I am using this program right. > >Computers Vs Grandmasters > >29 wins to 20 wins > >Who is better? > >Certainty = 87% (that the computers were better then the GM's(?)} > >Required wins = 29 > >Losers scored = 20 > >Games Required = 49 Interesting. The programs achieved a 2641 performance over the 49 game series against opponents with average ratings of 2568. I expect GM Kramnik (rated 2795) to demolish DF in the 8 game match since GM Kramnik will have 3 months to prepare. Adding in the 8 games and assuming 8 wins for Kramnik yeilds a performance of 2607 against opponents with an average ratine of 2600 over 57 games. This is a worst case evaluation, so the programs rating will go up if DF gets .5 or more in the match. :) If you put 29 to 28 into your program, it looks like they are roughly even, but to get close to even, the World Champ will need to study the program for 3 months and win all 8 games. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.