Author: odell hall
Date: 03:47:59 06/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2001 at 09:05:21, Chessfun wrote: >On June 10, 2001 at 02:55:54, odell hall wrote: > >>On June 10, 2001 at 02:52:50, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On June 10, 2001 at 02:14:50, odell hall wrote: >>> >>>>On June 09, 2001 at 23:56:07, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>>No. I don't think so. It was only 2 games, and not even tournament length >>>>>games at that. >>>>> >>>>>When I saw how easily Petr defeated Deep Shredder, I was amazed. He was >>>>>kibitz'ing most of the game. Like he didn't even have to concentrate. >>>>> >>>>>Remember, he said that Deep Shredder performance was approx. 2100-2200 FIDE in >>>>>the game against him? (Which it played 100x worse against him, I agree.) Guess >>>>>what Petr said about these games? >>>>> >>>>>Thoughts on ending of game 1: >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: it's very difficult for human to play positions with >>>>>compensations for a pawn >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: may be just white has no sufficient compensation :) >>>>>Project played like Machine :)) >>>>> >>>>>Game 2: >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: 4...Bxc3? >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: I beat Jrlok never play Bxc3 vs human GM :) >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: please think about it :) >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) kibitzes: comp played opening like patzer again >>>>> >>>>>And about the series: >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) tells you: hmm, comp played like 2200 in the closed position and >>>>>like 2600 in open :) It's hard to evaluate his strength >>>>> >>>>>Petrovich(GM) tells you: so, 2200+2600 / 2 = 2400 :) lol >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Petr and I just went over quickly the games. These are not annotated or >>>>>anything, just general conversation on the games. >>>>> >>>>>Also, please be aware that when I played Petr, I did _NOT_ prepare at all. I >>>>>asked him for a game, and we played. Having been singled out by JRLOK, I >>>>>prepared an better book. This time when I played JRLOK, there was no in & out >>>>>of book problems. >>>>> >>>>>Shredder played a much better game this time around, than last. However, I am >>>>>not ready to say that Shredder is GM strength. Like Robert said, to be 2600 you >>>>>have to play like a 2600 every game. Not 2100 here and 2700 here. 2600 ALL THE >>>>>TIME. >>>>> >>>>>I am planning more and more GM vs Shredder games. Perhaps at the end of this >>>>>year, we can make a FAIR guess at Deep Shredder's ELO. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Slate >>>> >>>> >>>> Well if what he said is true, a 2100-22000 just beat roman , one of the >>>>strongest grandmasters in computer chess around, and that is impressive. >>> >>>NO NO NO! He rated my performance against HIM as being about 2100-2200! Just >>>_ONE_ game! >>> >>>There's NO doubt Deep Shredder is stronger, it just had a "bad game." >>> >>> >>>Slate >> >> >>Yep just like many humans, i was surprised though that jrlok lost, since he >>knows computer chess so well, i expected a win. > > >Just my 2 cents for what it's worth. >Roman may lose to your program first few times, even first ten times. >But once he sees what book lines you have, what positions you play moves like a3 >or h3 in. Then he will play some more and win some. Make no changes and he will >pound you to pieces. This is one of the reasons I think Bob believes computers >are NOT GM strength. > >Sarah. Hi Sarah I am curios what do you believe? Since you have done alot of testing of programs, (and i have been to your site, very nice). Do you think they are Gm Strength? I realize that technically they can never be Grandmasters , since Fide will not give the title to a computer.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.