Author: stuart taylor
Date: 17:54:16 06/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 2001 at 18:41:58, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 12, 2001 at 14:48:10, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: > >> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2001-06-11 79042 games played by 219 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2653 29 -28 647 64% 2551 >> 2 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2650 43 -40 302 67% 2528 >> 3 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2632 43 -40 308 67% 2508 >> 4 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 23 -23 968 64% 2520 >> 5 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2596 20 -20 1230 62% 2509 >> 6 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2576 26 -26 733 61% 2499 >> 7 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2551 25 -25 804 58% 2496 >> 8 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2550 24 -23 897 58% 2491 >> 9 Nimzo 8.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2542 28 -28 612 54% 2511 >> 10 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2534 25 -25 790 58% 2478 > > > >Congratulations to Frans Morsch and Mathias Feist (and the ChessBase team). > >Deep Fritz is definitely a very tough client. You cannot lead the SSDF list by >accident, and leading it for so many years in a row is probably the best >achievement of a chess program of all times. > >If you want to sum up the history of chess programs for microcomputers, I think >you just need to remember 3 names: >* Richard Lang >* Frans Morsch and Mathias Feist > > > > Christophe The roarng absence of the name Christophe, appears of course, in the signature of the post. But I have a little question. Does Deep Fritz have any advantage in the testing e.g. the fact that it already stood at the top, long before the recent GT even arrived on the scene, and so may have had an advantageous starting point? S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.