Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 22:14:51 06/12/01
I run these 3 programs in my test suite, which contains 100 hard, but correct
ECM positions. I compared solved positions after 5s, 20s, 1m, 3m and 10 minutes
in my AMD 450Mhz (hash 90-128MB). Here's results:
5s 20s 1m 3m 10m
Chess Tiger 14 30 49 62 77 84
Goliath Light 17 46 74 84 91
Crafty 18.7 12 30 47 64 82
Here's same as graph:
| x
90 +
|
|
| x t
| c
80 +
|
| t
| x
|
70 +
|
|
| c
| t
60 +
|
|
|
|
50 + t
| c
| x
|
|
40 +
|
|
|
|
30 + t c
|
|
|
| x = Goliath
20 + t = Tiger
| c = Crafty
| x
|
| c
10 +
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------
5s 20s 1m 3m 10m
Interestingly Crafty gets more positions almost linear. Tiger starts best, but
then Goliath goes over. This is no big surprise, when it peaks over 1,4MNPS.
Jouni
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.