Author: Ed Panek
Date: 08:49:35 06/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2001 at 11:00:11, James T. Walker wrote: >On June 12, 2001 at 20:44:58, Ed Panek wrote: > >>Athlon 1.3Ghz 192 MBhash tables.. >> >>14:16:34.9 -0.50 25 -1715898192 >>07:27:40.6 -0.44 24 -344954985 >>00:00:31.9 -0.42 14 13011609 >>00:12:59.1 -0.36 20 339922649 >> >>Same position PIII 800 48 MB HASH tables >> >>17:57:26.9 -0.44 24 -1100754853 >>00:00:45.8 -0.42 14 13392336 >>00:23:58.1 -0.36 20 436641487 >>Bigger difference than I thought >> >> >>This is from the current Gt2 vs the web position >> >> >>Ed > >Hello Ed, >I have no idea what your numbers above mean but it seems to me that if you want >to compare processor speed you need to use the same amount of hash memory. I >can't get to the game to see what the position is like but if it's close to an >endgame or deep into an endgame the hash tables can make a very big difference. >Jim Hi Jim thanks for the reply..typically in computer chess the above means time-score-depth-nodes This position is close to an endgame. I understand that hash etc makes a big difference in search speed, but I never imagined it could be so dramatic. 13 minutes to 24 minutes to depth 20 for example. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.