Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I plan to settle this.

Author: Tapio Huuhka

Date: 09:19:55 06/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On June 13, 2001 at 05:49:32, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On June 13, 2001 at 03:42:41, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On June 12, 2001 at 23:56:26, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>Many IM's and GM's have felt the teeth of these and many other programs like
>>>Fritz, Junior, Tiger etc.
>>>
>>>However, it's true they lose to much lower rated players, even to me
>>>sometimes!;)
>
>That was a little wry humor, nothing more. I'ts not my fault you can't
>appreciate it!
>>
>>Humans have a hard time coping with this. Really? I think it's you not
>the GM's!
>>
>>A human who plays chess is an apple.  A computer that plays chess is not an
>>orange, but it's not quite an apple, either.  You can compare them, but not
>>perfectly.
>As if I didn't know the difference? The arrogance!
>>
>>A ludicrous example:  Compare an unarmed human with a tank.  A tank can blow up
>>a house at a range of over a kilometer, and can survive machine gun fire,
>>whereas an unarmed human cannot blow up a house at a range of even one meter,
>>and would fare badly against machine gun bullets.
>>
>>On the other hand, there are ditches that a tank cannot get out of, while a
>>human might have an easy time with these ditches.
>>
>>You can't deny the tank its strengths just because there's a ditch a human can
>>handle better.
>>
>>End of ludicrous example.  Computers are getting better at being uniformly
>>strong, but they are not now, and will probably never be, perfect human analogs.
>> There will always be the possibility that a weak human player can say "duh" to
>>one of these machines -- sometimes.
>
>How do you know that? Today I agree, fifty years from now A.I. may be born and a
>"computer" for a lack of a better term will be irrepressible!
>>
>>bruce
>
>They only thing *Ludicrous* Bruce is your rude and ignorant reply!
>I can beat these machines far more than you can imagine, and I'm _not_ a
>_weak_ player!
>And why did you snip my post?
>
>I was bieng humorous with last  sentence that you included in your
>reply!
>
>I've beaten some very strong players, _not_ just programms.
>I don't care to be compared as a *frail* human in regards to chess and GM's as
>*tanks* Mr. Moreland!
>
>By snipping my post, you missed my point entirely!
>
>I don't belittle your favorite "pet" , so please do not belittle me and my
>playing strength relative to GM's!
>
>Terry

I hope you have calmed down by now.:) Maybe I'm missing something, but I found
Bruce's post just interesting, not insulting. I'm curious about your playing
strength, because I couldn't find you on the FIDE list. So, what do you think is
the playing strength of _not_ a weak player? :)

Tapio



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.